Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6477139
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T06:54:42+00:00 2026-05-25T06:54:42+00:00

I have a simple c/c++ app that has an optional TCL interpreter with the

  • 0

I have a simple c/c++ app that has an optional TCL interpreter with the function wrappers generated using SWIG. For several of the functions all the arguments are optional. How is this typically handled? I’d like to support a TCL command like this, where any of the arguments are optional but the C function takes fixed arguments:

 //TCL command
 get_list [options] filename
   -opt1
   -opt2
   -opt3 arg1 
   -opt4 arg2
   filename

//C function
static signed get_list(bool         opt1,
                       bool         opt2,
                       char       * arg1,
                       objectType * arg2,
                       char       * fileName)

Currently I have something like this:

static pList * get_list(char    * arg1=NULL,
                        char    * arg2=NULL, 
                        char    * arg3=NULL,  
                        tObject * arg4=NULL)

This has many problems such as enforcing the object pointer is always the last argument. The SWIG documentation talks at length about C functions with variable arguments using “…” but I don’t think this is what I need. I’d like the C function arguments to be fixed.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T06:54:43+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 6:54 am

    The easiest method is to wrap a Tcl procedure around the outside, like this:

    rename get_list original.get_list
    proc get_list args {
        if {[llength $args] == 0 || [llength $args] % 2 == 0} {
            error "wrong # args: ...";   # Do a proper error message here!
        }
        # Handle the required argument
        set filename [lindex $args end]
        # Initialize the defaults
        array set opts {
            -opt1 false
            -opt2 false
            -opt3 ""
            -opt4 ""
        }
        # Merge in the supplied options
        foreach {opt val} [lrange $args 0 end-1] {
            if {![info exist opts($opt)]} {
                error "unrecognized option \"$opt\""
            }
            set opts($opt) $value
        }
        # Hand off to C level...
        original.get_list $opts(-opt1) $opts(-opt2) $opts(-opt3) $opts(-opt4) $filename
    }
    

    If you’ve got Tcl 8.6, that last handoff is best done with tailcall so the rewriting code is cut out of the Tcl stack. It’s not vital though, as SWIGged code rarely resolves names of Tcl commands and variables.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a simple cakephp app with table articles that has a cat_id column
I have a very simple Mac Cocoa app that just has a Web View
I have an iPhone app that shows a simple view (View 1) that has
I'm crating a simple MVC app that has People and Notes tables. Using the
I have a simple app that has a NSStatusItem, which only displays an icon.
I have a simple user registration page in my rails app that has two
I have a simple camera app, that has a AVCaptureVideoPreviewLayer inside a View. I
I have a simple app, that has media element in it, and it plays
I have a simple app that has a list of clients in one table
I have a simple app that has a set of coloured views, one red,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.