Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 655781
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T22:38:31+00:00 2026-05-13T22:38:31+00:00

I have a simple managed C++ assembly which I am providing unmanaged wrappers for

  • 0

I have a simple managed C++ assembly which I am providing unmanaged wrappers for some static methods I have in a C# assembly. One of these methods returns a string which I have converted to a “const char*” type in the C++ assembly. The trouble I am having is that when I load this dll from an unmanaged source, I get bad data back in the pointer. What can I do about this? I have simplified my testcase down to this:

managed assembly (Test.dll compiled with /clr; full code follows):

extern "C" {
    __declspec(dllexport) const char* GetValue(const char* s) {
        return s;
    }
}

unmanaged console win32 app:

#include "stdafx.h"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <tchar.h>
#include <windows.h>

typedef const char* (*GetValueFunc)(const char* s);

int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) {
    wprintf(L"Hello from unmanaged code\n");
    HMODULE hDll = LoadLibrary(L"Test.dll");
    if (!hDll)
        return GetLastError();

    wprintf(L"library found and loaded\n");

    GetValueFunc getValue = (GetValueFunc)GetProcAddress(hDll, "GetValue");
    if(!getValue)
        return GetLastError();
    wprintf(L"%s\n", getValue("asdf"));

    return 0;
}

I get the first two lines just fine, but the third line that comes out is garbage. It also doesn’t matter if I make the dll have “#pragma unmanaged” at the top of the cpp file or not (same results).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T22:38:31+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:38 pm

    wprintf with a %s format specifier will interpret your first parameter as a “const wchar_t*”, while you’re passing a “const char*” to it. Try to use wchar_t in your GetValue function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a simple little test app written in Flex 3 (MXML and some
I have an executing assembly, which generates another assembly dynamically using AssemblyBuilder. The generated
I have a script that appends some rows to a table. One of the
I have simple regex \.*\ for me its says select everything between and ,
Ok, i have simple scenario: have two pages: login and welcome pages. im using
In general, is it a best practice to have simple POJO Java classes implement
I develop tools in Autodesk Maya. Many of the tools I build have simple
Should simple JavaBeans that have only simple getters and setters be unit tested?? What
I have a simple webform that will allow unauthenticated users to input their information,
I have a simple 2-column layout with a footer that clears both the right

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.