Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 324415
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T09:07:19+00:00 2026-05-12T09:07:19+00:00

I have a simple object defined by an object literal, and have a couple

  • 0

I have a simple object defined by an object literal, and have a couple functions assigned to this object. Inside the functions, I try to access global variables, and it only gets undefined. The Flex debugger tells me the variables are just right up the scope tree.

Yes, I know I can access Thing by using ‘this’, that doesn’t solve my scope issue though.

Project Flex Compiler Settings: Flex SDK 3.4, Require Flash Player 10.x.

Example:

<mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml" creationComplete="Thing.bling();">

    <mx:Script>
        <![CDATA[
            var Thing:Object = {
                doStuff: function():void {
                    trace(blah); //blah is undefined
                },
                bling: function():void {
                    Thing.doStuff(); //Thing is undefined
                },

            };
        ]]>
    </mx:Script>

    <mx:Panel id="blah">

    </mx:Panel>
</mx:Application>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T09:07:19+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 9:07 am

    I’m not sure what your trouble is, but I cut and paste your exact code into a new Flex project and despite a simple syntax error (extra trailing comma in the Thing declaration) it traced what I would expect:

    Test0.blah
    

    (Given that my project name is Test and the panel blah is the first object).

    I used Flex 3.3 then tried Flex 3 both on Flash Player 10,0,22,87

    edit:
    I can reproduce now if I alter the project properties by following the instructions in the comments:
    Flex Builder -> Properties -> Flex Compiler -> Require Flash Player Version -> 10.0.0

    With this setting the behaviour does not appear in Flex 3.0 but does appear in 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4.

    I suggest this is a bug and you should find a way to work around it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Well, the question is kinda simple. I have a object defined as: public class
Currently I have a simple knockoutJS object, with a few observables. But this object
I have huge amont of geographic data represented in simple object structure consisting only
I have a simple question regarding accessing member variables of a model object. I
I have a very simple object called CellData. Is defined as: public sealed class
I have a simple json parsed object that sometimes has a variable tt defined
I have a simple object that allows you to assign three properties (x,y,z) (lets
Say I have a simple object such as class Something { public int SomeInt
Say I have a simple object which supports implicit casting to System.String public sealed
I have a simple JavaScript Array object containing a few numbers. [267, 306, 108]

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.