Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3211020
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T14:39:27+00:00 2026-05-17T14:39:27+00:00

I have a simple question. I use a singleton which implements an abstract class.

  • 0

I have a simple question. I use a singleton which implements an abstract class. Is it possible to put the getInstance() Method and the variable $_instance in the abstract class instead of the concrete one I want to create?

Here’s my code:

<?php
class Command_Log extends Command_Abstract {
    private static $_instance=null;

    public static function getInstance() {
        if (self::$_instance==null)
        self::$_instance=new self();
        return self::$_instance;
    }

    protected function realExecute() {
    }

    protected function realSimulate($fileHandle) {
    }

}

and

<?php

abstract class Command_Abstract implements Command_Interface {
    protected $_data=array();
    //private static $_instance=null;
    protected $_isExecuted=false;
    protected $_execute=false;


    public function enableExecute() {
        $this->_execute=true;
        return $this;
    }

    protected function __construct() {

    }
    protected function __clone() {}


    public function addData($data) {

        array_push($this->_data,$data);
        return $this;
    }

    abstract protected function realExecute();

    abstract protected function realSimulate($fileHandle);

    public function execute() {
        if(!$this->_isExecuted && $this->_execute) {
            $this->_isExecuted = true;
            $this->realExecute();
        }
    }

    public function simulate() {
        $exitSystem = false;
        if(!$this->_isExecuted && $this->_execute) {
            $this->_isExecuted = true;
                $exitSystem = $this->realSimulate($fh);
            }
        }
        return $exitSystem;
    }

}

I have many implementations of the the commands, so I don’t want redundant code everywhere in my implementations. Is it possible to put these two things in the abstract class, if yes please tell me how.

If not please explain it to me why it isnt possbile. Or if I need to change something to do it, anyhow.

regards

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T14:39:28+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:39 pm

    YES WE CAN!

    I have a class called Singleton that is abstract… and many classes that extends that Singleton class… this is the code:

    abstract class Singleton {
    
        private static $instances = array();
    
        final private function __construct($_params) {
            $class = get_called_class();
            if (array_key_exists($class, self::$instances))
                throw new Exception('An instance of '. $class .' already exists !');
    
            //static::initialize(); //In PHP 5.3
            $this->initialize($_params); 
        }
        final private function __clone() { }
    
        abstract protected function initialize();
    
        public static function getInstance($_params=array()) {
            $class = get_called_class();
            if (array_key_exists($class, self::$instances) === false){
                self::$instances[$class] = new $class($_params);
            } 
            return self::$instances[$class];
        }
    }
    

    and (for example) the class DBConnection that extends from Singleton

    class DBConnection extends Singleton{
    
        private $connexion_pdo=null;
    
        protected function initialize(){
                 //connect to the DB
            $this->connexion_pdo = blablalba;
        }
    }
    

    although there are some problems in php 5.2.. specially with the function get_called_class() and the static::initialize()

    You could also check the php site for patterns… there are lots of contributions for the singleton

    Good Luck

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a simple question and wish to hear others' experiences regarding which is
I have a simple question. Is there a way ( using reflections I suppose
I have a simple question related to one-line programming. First an example: function test(a)
I have a simple question about Java's XML API and I hope there's a
I'm new to postgreSQL and I have a simple question: I'm trying to create
I have a very simple question. I want to test whether a particular port
I am learning LINQ and have a very simple question that I think will
A simple question: I have a Model-View-Controller setup, with Models accessing a SQL database.
Pretty simple question: When i have a persistable object, it usually has a property
Simple question: do I have to delete or delete [] c ? Does the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.