Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 219649
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:51:54+00:00 2026-05-11T18:51:54+00:00

I have a simple static class with a few methods in it. Each of

  • 0

I have a simple static class with a few methods in it. Each of those methods open a SqlConnection, query the database and close the connection. This way, I am sure that I always close the connection to the database, but on the other hand, I don’t like to always open and close connection. Below is an example of what my methods look like.

public static void AddSomething(string something)
{
    using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection("..."))
    {
        connection.Open();
        // ...
        connection.Close();
    }
}

Considering that the methods are inside a static class, should I have a static member containing a single SqlConnection? How and when should I drop it? What are the best practices?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:51:54+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:51 pm

    No, don’t keep a static SqlConnection unless you have to. Threading would be one concern, but more importantly – usually you simply don’t need to. With your code as presented, the internal connection pooling means that most of the time you will get the same underlying connection on successive calls anyway (as long as you use the same connection string). Let the pooler do its job; leave the code alone.

    This also avoids the issues of what happens when you start having two threads… now each can do work on their own connection; with static (assuming you don’t use [ThreadStatic]) you’d have to synchronize, introducing delays. Not to mention re-entrancy (i.e. a single thread trying to use the same connection twice at the same time). Yup; leave the code alone. It is fine now, and almost any change you make would make it not fine.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 180k
  • Answers 180k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Absolutely. Nullable types are perfectly fine. Otherwise, you'd have to… May 12, 2026 at 4:00 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I am dealing with many-to-many relationships just fine in Linq2SQL.… May 12, 2026 at 4:00 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I have defined a block function that excludes small blocks… May 12, 2026 at 4:00 pm

Related Questions

Is there a best practice for making private methods in classes static? I have
I have a large .NET web application. The system has projects for different intentions
I'm a brand-newbie to C#, albeit not programming, so please forgive me if I
I was looking for a generic method in .Net to encode a string for

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.