Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6044851
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T07:03:32+00:00 2026-05-23T07:03:32+00:00

I have a simple test that runs a query 5000 times. The linq version

  • 0

I have a simple test that runs a query 5000 times. The linq version of the query takes over 3 times the HQL and the cached Linq version is significantly slower than the cached version of HQL

HQL:

session.CreateQuery(String.Format("from Episode where SeriesId='{0}' and SeasonNumber='{1}' and EpisodeNumber='{2}'", seriesId, seasonNumber, episodeNumber))
               .SetMaxResults(1)
               .SetCacheable(true)
               .UniqueResult<Episode>();

Linq:

session.Query<Episode>()
       .Where(c => c.SeriesId == seriesId && c.SeasonNumber == seasonNumber && c.EpisodeNumber == episodeNumber)
       .Cacheable()
       .FirstOrDefault();

Here are the results

HQL:   Cached: less than a second   No-Cache: 5 seconds
LINQ:  Cached: 8 seconds            No-Cache: 15 seconds

I just want to make sure that I’m experiencing an expected overhead and not something that I’m doing wrong.

if that over head is there and there is not much I could do, can you suggest maybe a middle ground, that would require less strings but provide better performance?

Note:
My cache setting in Fluent Nhibernate
.Cache(c => c.UseQueryCache().UseSecondLevelCache().UseMinimalPuts().ProviderClass<HashtableCacheProvider>())

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T07:03:33+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 7:03 am

    I guess the problem is the following. This query:

    session.Query<Episode>()
           .Where(c => c.SeriesId == seriesId && c.SeasonNumber == seasonNumber && c.EpisodeNumber == episodeNumber)
           .Cacheable()
           .FirstOrDefault();
    

    loads all episodes from the database, puts them into cache, and then returns the first instance of the collection. When FirstOrDefault is called, the query for Where(c => c.SeriesId == seriesId && c.SeasonNumber == seasonNumber && c.EpisodeNumber == episodeNumber) is executed and then FirstOrDefault is applied on the whole sequence returned.

    Something like:

    1. .Where(c => c.SeriesId == seriesId && c.SeasonN... SQL is executed
    2. .FirstOrDefault() is evaluated over all elements of collection of 1.

    So if you try something like

    session.Query<Episode>()
           .Where(c => c.SeriesId == seriesId && c.SeasonNumber == seasonNumber && c.EpisodeNumber == episodeNumber)
           .Cacheable()
           .SetMaxResults(1)
           .UniqueResult();
    

    it should behave the same like your HQL query.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a very simple unit test that just allocates a lot of Strings:
I have a simple test bash script which looks like that: #!/bin/bash cmd=rsync -rv
I have the following simple python test script that uses Suds to call a
I have a simple test application (C# console application) that does an HTTP GET
I have a simple web service that uses an oracle database. When I test
I have a simple HelloWorld Activity that I try to test with an Android
I have a very simple query that is not much more complicated than: select
I have a strange build problem. I have a simple test program that sends
I have a simple test that connects to an internal portal. I have selenium
I have a simple python script that just runs an infinite while loop and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.