Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1042531
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T15:31:24+00:00 2026-05-16T15:31:24+00:00

I have a simple threading question – how should the following be synchronized? I

  • 0

I have a simple threading question – how should the following be synchronized?

I have main thread and a secondary thread that does something only once and something – more that once.

Basically:

Secondary thread:

{
   Do_Something_Once();

   while (not_important_condition) {
      Do_Something_Inside_Loop();
   }
}

I want to suspend my main thread unless Do_Something_Once action is done and right now I use a plain bool value is_something_once_done = false; to indicate if the action is finished.

Hence, the code of my main thread looks like this:

{
   Launch_Secondary_Thread();

   while (!is_something_once_done) {
      boost::this_thread::sleep(milliseconds(25));
   }
}

which obviously isn’t the best way to perform such kind of synchronization.

Any alternatives (better if boost::thread – powered)?

Thank you

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T15:31:25+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 3:31 pm

    This is a job for condition variables.

    Check out the Condition Variables section of the boost docs – the example there is almost exactly what you’re doing.

    Whatever you do, don’t do a busy-wait loop with sleep

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.