Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8112813
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T02:38:05+00:00 2026-06-06T02:38:05+00:00

I have a singly-linked list containing 1 value in each element. struct listElement {

  • 0

I have a singly-linked list containing 1 value in each element.

struct listElement
{
    char guid[20];
    struct listElement *next;
    struct listElement *last;
    int numElements;
};

The code launches 10 pthreads in a pool that are all pthread_cond_wait() for an element to get added to the list.

My main() is reading strings from a file, one line at a time and populating the linked list by calling listPush(val)

listPush(val) acquires lock, creates new element, adds to end of list (or creates head if empty) unlocks then calls pthread_cond_signal() to let one of the 10 threads know there is now an element with work to be done.

In the case where numElements > numThreads I call pthread_cond_broadcast() because there should be enough work for each thread to pop and go.

Each thread listPop(rVal)‘s off a value (locks, removes, fixes pointers, unlocks) and processes it, then goes back to pthread_cond_wait() state.

My file has around 200 million lines. (1.2GB) I don’t want my linked list to get this large so I am trying to “throttle” the size of linked list.

Inside listPush(), before I lock the mutex, I have

if(head && head->numElements >= maxNumElements)
{
    while(head && head->numElements >= maxNumElements)
    {
        sleep(1);
    }
}

The idea is that if I “fill up” my list, I wait for the threads to process a chunk of it before adding more. I’ve reached this point where the app starts “pulsing”; basically I can see it waiting 1 second. I would expect this to never happen or happen very infrequently.

Is there a better way to limit the size of my list other than using sleep()?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T02:38:07+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 2:38 am

    This sounds like a classic producer-consumer problem. The solution is to have listPush() wait on a condition variable if the list is too big. Then one of the consumer threads can signal this condition variable once a list element has been consumed.

    A completely different approach is to just use a pipe() to handle both the communication and the synchronization. That will obviate the need for both the linked list and the mutex.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose, I have a singly linked list and its basic building block is, struct
I have a singly linked list and I need to sort it in constant
Possible Duplicate: Reverse a singly linked list reverse a linked list? I have been
I have to permute N first elements of a singly linked list of length
I have a very simple C code for constructing a Singly Linked list as
I have written this function to delete the last node of a singly linked
I have a singly linked list with node and list structs defined as: typedef
I have a Linked List and I want to implement a function: Random_Shuffle_List (struct
Below, I wrote a primitive singly linked list in C. Function addEditNode MUST receive
I need to implement a priority queue in C programming using singly linked list.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.