Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7010577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T22:00:35+00:00 2026-05-27T22:00:35+00:00

I have a situation that I thought would be straightforward and fairly common but

  • 0

I have a situation that I thought would be straightforward and fairly common but am having trouble locating resources on how to accomplish this. Perhaps I am just using the wrong terminology to search for on this.

Basically, I have a situation where I have an two entities (pseudocode below):

@Entity:
User {

int id;

String username;

}



@Entity
Datarecord {

User user;

String recordEntry;
}

I want to make it so that there can only be one DataRecord entry per User with the same recordEntry value. So, there can be many entries in the database with the same recordEntry but each one must be associated with a different user. Could anyone point me to resources on this. Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T22:00:35+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 10:00 pm

    I think what you need is a ManyToMany relationship between User and DataRecord. This will create a join table satisfying your criteria.

    So while User table will have unique users and DataRecord table will have unique recordEntries, the join table will have records that map a user to multiple recordEntries. Correspondingly, a record entry will be mapped to multiple users.

    user_recordentry_table
    
    user  recordEntry
    ----  -----------
    U1       R1
    U1       R2
    U1       R3
    U2       R1
    U2       R2
    U2       R3
    ....
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a crazy situation that I cannot figure out: I have this string:
I'm having trouble figuring this one out. The situation is no difficult to imagine
The situation is that I have a table that models an entity. This entity
I have an odd situation occurring that I am trying to diagnose and would
I have a situation that I solved in the following way: //cube_potentials is float8
I have a situation that requires redirecting users who are already logged in away
I have that situation: I have models Item, Region and Country. class Item(models.Model): name
I have an interesting situation that EMF forced me into: abstract class AbstractDog{ ...
I have an situation here that looks very like a SELECT N+1 from the
We have situation where say we have four engineers that are working on software

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.