Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3781984
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T11:01:10+00:00 2026-05-19T11:01:10+00:00

I have a situation where the remote repository has some bad commits. e.g. …

  • 0

I have a situation where the remote repository has some “bad” commits.
e.g.

... o ---- C ---- A ---- B  origin/master 

Where A is bad (but B is good)
I want the remote to become…

... o ---- C ---- B  origin/master 
                   \
                    A  origin/dev 

It is not obvious to me how to do this.

In the case where a rebase is inappropriate a different result is needed.

... o ---- C ---- A ---- B ---- ~A origin/master 
                          \
                           -  origin/dev 

This results in a dev branch containing the A commit and the master not containing the A commit.
The revised question is:
How to do an anti-cherry-pick?
So rather than generating a patch which changes the repository from state C to A apply a patch which changes B to A.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T11:01:10+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 11:01 am

    Pull so that you have the same repository locally.

    Use git rebase --interactive (see this rundown if you are unfamiliar with interactive rebase) to reorder the A and B commits, so that you now have

    ... o ---- o ---- B ---- A  master 
    

    Checkout a new branch dev from that spot, so you get

    ... o ---- o ---- B ---- A  master, dev
    

    Switch to the master branch, do a git reset --hard HEAD^ to rewind that branch one commit. You now have

    ... o ---- o ---- B  master 
                       \
                        A  dev 
    

    Now git push --force --all and you should be golden. (You need --force because you are rewriting history in the remote repository, which is dangerous and not recommended if other developers have already pulled from it.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have a situation in our product where for a long time some data
I have a situation where I want to create a signature of a data
I have a situation where I want to copy the output assembly from one
We have a situation where users are allowed to upload content, and then separately
I have a situation where I might have multiple instances of a program running
I have the situation where i use GIS software which stores the information about
I have a situation where I have two entities that share a primary key
I have a situation where another developer is including source files from a project
I have a situation where I have two models, companies and permissions, where companies
I have following situation: I have loged user, standard authentication with DB table $authAdapter

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.