Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1115275
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T03:07:58+00:00 2026-05-17T03:07:58+00:00

I have a small hierarchy of classes that all implement a common interface. Each

  • 0

I have a small hierarchy of classes that all implement a common interface.

Each of the concrete class needs to receive a settings structure containing for instance only public fields. The problem is that the setting structure

  • has a part common to all classes
  • has another part that vary from one concrete class to another

I was wondering if you had in your mind any elegant design to handle this. I would like to build something like:

BaseFunc doer = new ConcreteImplementation1();

with ConcreteImplementation1 implements BaseFunc. And have something like

doer.setSettings(settings)

but have the ”settings” object having a concrete implementation that would be suitable to ConcreteImplementation1.

How would you do that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T03:07:59+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:07 am

    This may be a named design pattern, if it is, I don’t know the name.
    Declare an abstract class that implements the desired interface. The abstract class constructor should take an instance of your settings object from which it will extract the global settings. Derive one or more classes from the abstract class. The derived class constructor should take an instance of your settings object, pass it to the parent class constructor, then extract any local settings.

    Below is an example:

    class AbstractThing implements DesiredInterface
    {
        private String globalSettingValue1;
        private String globalSettingValue2;
    
        protected AbstractThing(Settings settings)
        {
            globalSettingValue1 = settings.getGlobalSettingsValue1();
            globalSettingValue2 = settings.getGlobalSettingsValue2();
        }
    
        protected String getGlobalSettingValue1()
        {
            return globalSettingValue1;
        }
    
        protected String getGlobalSettingValue2()
        {
            return globalSettingValue2;
        }
    }
    
    class DerivedThing extends AbstractThing
    {
        private String derivedThingSettingValue1;
        private String derivedThingSettingValue2;
    
        public DerivedThing(Settings settings)
        {
            super(settings);
            derivedThingSettingValue1 = settings.getDerivedThingSettingsValue1();
            derivedThingSettingValue2 = settings.getDerivedThingSettingsValue2();
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a small application I am working on that at one point needs
I have a small class hierarchy where I would like to have a child
I have a small hierarchy of objects that I need to serialize and transmit
Suppose I have a small inheritance hierarchy of Animals: public interface IAnimal { string
I have a small JS function that does Ajax for me and another like
I have a small utility that I use to download an MP3 file from
I have a small VB.NET application that I'm working on using the full version
I'm using a library that defines an interface: template<class desttype> void connect(desttype* pclass, void
I have small page which has label, DropDownList and a submit button. <div> <asp:label
I have small problem with my .net 2.0 winforms application. I want to embed

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.