Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 95411
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T23:39:14+00:00 2026-05-10T23:39:14+00:00

I have a solution that is missing a lot of code coverage. I need

  • 0

I have a solution that is missing a lot of code coverage. I need to refactor this code to decouple to begin to create unit tests. What is the best strategy? I am first thinking that I should push to decouple business logic from data access from businessobjects to first get some organization and then drill down from there. Since many of the classes don’t support single responsible principle, it’s hard to begin testing them.

Are there are other suggestions or best practices from taking a legacy solution and getting it into shape to be ready for code coverage and unit testing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T23:39:15+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 11:39 pm

    Check out Working Effectively with Legacy Code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a json hash which has a lot of keys. I retrieve this
I have a MEF based solution that has several exported implementations of an interface.
I have a lot of objects of type ContainedClass stored in an object of
I have an application that receives a pointer to JPEG data from a camera
I have a perl script that will perform some operations on directories, and I
I'm strongly considering adding unit testing to an existing project that is in production.
Designing a fairly complicated site with a lot of ajax running on a single
We're designing a WPF / MVVM application that allows the user to search and
Here’s a problem I’ve really been struggling with. I need to merge two sorted
I am writing a software package whose job is to export DB data from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.