Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I have a SQL Server database that has a huge proliferation of stored procedures. Large numbers of stored procedures are not a problem in my Oracle databases because of the Oracle ‘package’ feature.
What do programmers do to get around the lack of a ‘package’ feature like that of Oracle?
While SQL Server has nothing to offer by way of the ‘cool features’ of encapsulation and package state like you are used to, you can organize your stored procedures into schemas.
In enterprise manager, these procs are still all listed together which makes for a HUGE treelist if you have hundreds of procs. I too miss the organization and cool features of Oracle packages. However, all platforms have their strengths.
NOTE: Writing stored procedures in the .NET language DOES give you encapsulation and state. It still does not however separate them in the EM treeview in any special way.