Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8832715
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T08:35:51+00:00 2026-06-14T08:35:51+00:00

I have a statement that throws a lot of checked exceptions. I can add

  • 0

I have a statement that throws a lot of checked exceptions. I can add all catch blocks for all of them like this:

try {
    methodThrowingALotOfDifferentExceptions();
} catch(IOException ex) {
    throw new MyCustomInitializationException("Class Resolver could not be initialized.", ex);
} catch(ClassCastException ex) {
    throw new MyCustomInitializationException("Class Resolver could not be initialized.", ex);
} catch...

I do not like this because they are all handled same way so there is kind of code duplication and also there is a lot of code to write. Instead could catch Exception:

try {
    methodThrowingALotOfDifferentExceptions();
} catch(Exception ex) {
    throw new MyCustomInitializationException("Class Resolver could not be initialized.", ex);
}

That would be ok, except I want all runtime exceptions to be thrown away without being caught. Is there any solution to this? I was thinking that some clever generic declaration of the type of exception to be caught might do the trick (or maybe not).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T08:35:52+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 8:35 am

    You could do the following:

    try {
        methodThrowingALotOfDifferentExceptions();
    } catch(RuntimeException ex) {
        throw ex;
    } catch(Exception ex) {
        throw new MyCustomInitializationException("Class Resolver could not be initialized.", ex);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a sql statement that uses Difference => http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188753.aspx I do this in
I have a piece of network code that throws various exception which are all
I have a method that has many many statements like this: employee.LastName = file.EMPLOYEE.NAME.SUBNAME.FAMILYNAME.NAMEPART1.Value;
I have a simple C# statement: var code = container.thing.result.decode ?? Unknown; That throws
I have a case statement that returns a date; case when (ma.first_active_date is not
I have a sql statement that concatenates two columns, ItemNumber and Name, into one
I have an UPDATE statement that's intended to update a status field for a
I have an IF statement that consists of two separate function calls passing values
I have a LINQ statement that returns an anonymous type. I need to get
I have an SQL statement that I'm executing through OleDb, the statement is something

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.