Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7868859
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T01:07:58+00:00 2026-06-03T01:07:58+00:00

I have a static array and in a function I create a new struct

  • 0

I have a static array and in a function I create a new struct in a loop and assign it to each index in an array. In the function I can see the values but in a different function I see junk for the array values. Do I have to use malloc for something like this?

struct file_types
{
    char * typename;
    char * MIMEtype;
};

static struct file_types *file_type_table; //Table of parameters
static int file_type_table_num=0;

int add_to_filetype_table(char *param, int param_len, char *value, int val_len, char* value2)
{   if ((param == NULL) || (value==NULL) || (value2 == NULL))
        return 0;
    if ((strcmp(param,"type") != 0) || (strcmp(value,"") == 0) || (strcmp(value2,"") == 0))
        return 0;

    if (file_type_table==NULL)
        file_type_table =   emalloc(sizeof(struct file_types));
    else
        file_type_table =  erealloc(file_type_table, (file_type_table_num*sizeof(struct file_types)+ sizeof(struct file_types)));

    file_type_table_num += 1;
    int index = file_type_table_num -1;

    struct file_types new_struct;
    new_struct.typename = value;
    new_struct.MIMEtype = value2;

    file_type_table[index] = new_struct;

    return 1;
}

Problem is in accessing the structs here:

char* get_table_value(char * key)
{   logg("In get_table_value");
    int i;

    char* value;

    for (i=0;i<file_type_table_num;i++)
    {   
        if (strcmp(((file_type_table)[i]).typename, key) == 0)
        {   
            return (file_type_table[i]).MIMEtype;
        }
    }
    return value;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T01:07:59+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 1:07 am

    There are two problems in your code:

    Problem 1:

    The structure new_struct itself is located on the stack and it gets deallocated once the scope of the function ends, So what your array elements point to beyond the scope of the function is something that doesn’t exist, aka garbage.

    Solution:
    The structure needs to reside on the heap memory to be accessed beyond the scope.


    Problem 2:

    new_struct.typename = value;
    new_struct.MIMEtype = value2;
    

    Creates a shallow copy of the pointers being passed to the function add_to_filetype_table(), From the example it is not clear who owns the pointers being passed to the function & what is their lifetime, If these pointers are deallocated before you call get_table_value() then your global static structure is left with dangling pointers and hence you would get garbage values when you output them.

    Solution:

    You need to make a Deep copy of the pointers being passed.
    Allocate memory to the structure members and then copy(strcpy()) the strings in to allocated memory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an array list of objects in my application. private static ArrayList<Player> userList=new
Why can we have static final members but cant have static method in an
I have the following function: public static T TryGetArrayValue<T>(object[] array_, int index_) { ...
Suppose I have some pointer, which I want to reinterpret as static dimension array
I have an array defined as; static double Temp_data[TABLE_SIZE]; I want to change the
I have a two dimensional array public class TwoDimensions { public static void main(String[]
I intended to create a class which only have static members and static functions.
Let's see if I can describe this properly... I have an abstract class that
I'm trying to create an array in one method (or function? Or object? Side
I have this function I am using to decrypt values that works fine on

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.