Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7599319
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T22:37:57+00:00 2026-05-30T22:37:57+00:00

I have a stemming algorithm in Java which requires a static final HashMap<String, String>

  • 0

I have a stemming algorithm in Java which requires a static final HashMap<String, String> pre-filled with about 30 000 records.

I need the map to keep records in the same order they are inserted (I got a hint I could use LinkedHashMap?).

I thought I could manually insert the values in the Java class file since this is the quickest way to load them in RAM (time / productivity is very important for this project) by using 30 000 calls like

map.put("Key", "Value");

The problem is, that java (or at least eclipse) allows only 65kb of code in any segment / method etc. So I ended up extending 11 classes and putting 65kb of .puts in a constructor or a static { }.

Everything was fine, but when I run it the order is scrambled. For so many rows I cannot track where did things go wrong, in the extending order or in the map.

So, please tell me what is the best way you would fill a final map in java with regards to performance.

P.S.: Loading and parsing the records from a file is far too slow…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T22:37:58+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 10:37 pm

    Everything was fine, but when I run it the order is scrambled. For so
    many rows I cannot track where did things go wrong, in the extending
    order or in the map.

    a) A HashMap doesn’t preserve insertion order. Use a LinkedHashMap instead.
    Or, since you will use it as a constant, consider a Guava ImmutableMap. It preserves insertion oder, is immutable and provides a builder object for constructing it with many values.

    b)

    P.S.: Loading the records from a file is far too slow…

    Why? It would only be done once, during class load time. And 35K String / String pairs is really not a lot of data for a modern machine.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two questions, stemming from observed behavior of C# static methods (which I
Below is Porters Stemming Algorithm for JavaScript which I have taken from here: http://tartarus.org/~martin/PorterStemmer/js.txt
Have just started using Visual Studio Professional's built-in unit testing features, which as I
I am trying to use this code for the Porter stemming algorithm in a
I have a question which closely relates to this question . In my schema
I'm discovering a simple solution for singular-plural keywords searches. I heard about stemming but
I have a database which has very similar rows within the same table. Those
I have stemming enabled in my Solr instance, I had assumed that in order
I have a somewhat large document and want to do stop-word elimination and stemming
Have just started using Google Chrome , and noticed in parts of our site,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.