Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6586395
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T16:47:08+00:00 2026-05-25T16:47:08+00:00

I have a stored procedure that when called does a large amount of processing.

  • 0

I have a stored procedure that when called does a large amount of processing. Various parts of the stored procedure are wrapped in their own transactions but, the entire proc. does not run in a transaction as this would cause unnecessary blocking and harm performance. The problem I have is that if a user closes the user interface after the proc. has started and before it ends, the connection closes and the proc. stops executing.

Is there any way to do this asynchronously or in another process that won’t abort if the user interface application is closed during processing.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T16:47:08+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 4:47 pm

    Look at the C# Task Parallel Library.
    You can create a task which is very simple. For example…

        Task myTask= new Task(() => {
            Console.WriteLine(@"hello");
            //Call stored procedure here
        });
        myTask.start();
    

    This will run the code wrapped in the task in parallel with the main thread. If you wish to check the task is complete you can use

        if(myTask.IsCompleted())
        {
            Console.WriteLine(@"My task is finished");
        }
    

    This method avoided altering the stored procedure and allows C# to handle the performance.

    Edit:-
    And to avoid the main thread finishing first add

        Task.WaitAll(myTask);
    

    This will sleep the main thread until the task is complete.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a stored procedure that needs to convert hexadecimal numbers to their decimal
So I have a stored procedure that does the following (modified out the data
I have created a method that can be called using a stored procedure name
I have stored procedure that insanely times out every single time it's called from
I have a stored procedure that has a parameter called UserName and in my
I have a stored procedure that gets called hundreds of times per minute. Every
I have a stored procedure that is called to validate a user during login.
I have stored procedures in SQL Server T-SQL that are called from .NET within
I have a strange, sporadic issue. I have stored procedure that returns back 5
I have a stored procedure that consists of a single select query used to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.