Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 935213
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T21:07:19+00:00 2026-05-15T21:07:19+00:00

I have a stored procedure which uses a FOR XML statement at the end

  • 0

I have a stored procedure which uses a FOR XML statement at the end of it, and returns me some XML.

I am using .NET 4 and the Entity Framework and when I do a function import of this stored procedure and try to call it through the Entity Framework it truncates the return at 2033 characters.

I swapped the Entity Framework for a traditional ADO.NET approach to call the stored procedure which had the same problem – truncated at 2033 characters – which is when I came across the following MSDN article explaining this is by-design and to use the “ExecuteXMLReader” method to overcome it:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310378

So this is working now as a temporary fix but I’d like to use Entity Framework function imports so I’ve not got ADO.NET code mixed up with EF code.

Is there some way I can use function imports in EF, return the XML and overcome the 2033 character limit?

Regards
bgs264

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T21:07:19+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:07 pm

    I ran into the same issue today.

    The EF function call returns the XML in 2033-long string ‘chunks’ (e.g. if your XML was 5000 chars long you would receive 3 results: 2 of 2033 chars and 1 of 934 chars)

    You can easily append these chunks to return a full list of the XML.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.