I have a strange situation that has me perplexed a bit….
I have an XML data file I am trying to validate against a schema that seems to give different results depending on the parsers used. Not sure what I am doing wrong or how to better represent the constraints in the schema so that all the parsers can properly validate the XML…. Here is a snippet of the problem portion of the Schema:
<xsd:element name="DemoValues">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation>Demo values for any, or all, of the demo categories defined on the GAP . A
demo value includes a reference to the category it applies to, a value in the appropriate
format and an optional market reference if it is for a specific market. If the market
reference is omitted the demo value applies to the entire area serviced by the outlet. Each
demo category may only have a single demo value within this group of demo values. However if
the demo value is for a market, there may be a demo value per market within this group of
demo values. </xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="DemoValue" type="gap:demoValueType" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:unique name="DemoValueConstraint">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation>Constraint allows only up to one demo value for a demo category, and per
market when a market reference exists. </xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
<xsd:selector xpath="gap:DemoValue"/>
<xsd:field xpath="@demoRef"/>
<xsd:field xpath="@marketRef|@demoRef"/>
</xsd:unique>
Here is the offending XML:
<DemoValues>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM0" marketRef="MKT1">0.40</DemoValue>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM1">15.00</DemoValue>
</DemoValues>
Produces this error:
Element ‘{http://www.AAAA.org/schemas/canadianTVGAP}DemoValue’, attribute ‘marketRef’: The XPath ‘@marketRef|@demoRef’ of a field of unique identity-constraint ‘{http://www.AAAA.org/schemas/canadianTVGAP}DemoValueConstraint’ evaluates to a node-set with more than one member.
Simplified Error is:
The field ‘marketRef’ is expecting at the most one value.
The intent for the xml is to allow all these combinations:
1)
<DemoValues>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM0" marketRef="MKT1">0.40</DemoValue>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM1">15.00</DemoValue>
</DemoValues>
2)
<DemoValues>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM0" marketRef="MKT1">0.40</DemoValue>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM0" marketRef="MKT2">0.41</DemoValue>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM0" marketRef="MKT3">0.42</DemoValue>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM0" marketRef="MKT4">0.43</DemoValue>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM1">15.00</DemoValue>
</DemoValues>
3)
<DemoValues>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM0" marketRef="MKT1">0.40</DemoValue>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM1" marketRef="MKT1">0.41</DemoValue>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM2" marketRef="MKT1">0.42</DemoValue>
<DemoValue demoRef="DM3">15.00</DemoValue>
</DemoValues>
Thanks for any help!!
Do you need to use field here for some other reason than to restrict the attribute list to the combinations you describe?
An XML element can have, at most, one instance of any named attribute. This is a fact about XML, independent of schema.
In your definition of
gap:demoValueType, simply specify the two attributes by using<xsd:attribute ... />. By the look of your examples, you probably want to useuse="required"on the definition of @demoref)