Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 221093
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:00:03+00:00 2026-05-11T19:00:03+00:00

I have a struct that only contains pointers to memory that I’ve allocated. Is

  • 0

I have a struct that only contains pointers to memory that I’ve allocated. Is there a way to recursively free each element that is a pointer rather than calling free on each one?

For example, let’s say I have this layout:

typedef struct { ... } vertex;
typedef struct { ... } normal;
typedef struct { ... } texture_coord;

typedef struct
{
    vertex* vertices;
    normal* normals;
    texture_coord* uv_coords;
    int* quads;
    int* triangles;
} model;

And in my code I malloc each of the structs to create a model:

model* mdl = malloc (...);
mdl->vertices = malloc (...);
mdl->normals = malloc (...);
mdl->uv_coords = malloc (...);
mdl->quads = malloc (...);
mdl->triangles = malloc (...);

It’s straightforward to free each pointer as so:

free (mdl->vertices);
free (mdl->normals);
free (mdl->uv_coords);
free (mdl->quads);
free (mdl->triangles);
free (mdl);

Is there a way that I can recursively iterate through the pointers in mdl rather than calling free on each element?

(In practice it’s barely any work to just write free() for each one, but it would reduce code duplication and be useful to learn from)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:00:04+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:00 pm

    Such functionality is not built in to C, but you can cheat a little bit by abusing the macro preprocessor:

    #define XX_MODEL_POINTERS do { \
      xx(vertices); xx(normals); xx(uv_coords); xx(quads); xx(triangles); \
    } while(0)
    

    To allocate:

    model *mdl = malloc(sizeof(*mdl));
    assert(mdl);
    #define xx(N) mdl->N = malloc(sizeof(*mdl->N)); assert(mdl->N)
    XX_MODEL_POINTERS;
    #undef xx
    

    To free:

    assert(mdl);
    #define xx(N) free(mdl->N); mdl->NULL
    XX_MODEL_POINTERS;
    #undef xx
    free(mdl);
    mdl = NULL;
    

    The nasty bit is that the definition of struct model and the definition of XX_MODEL_POINTERS can become mutually inconsistent, and there’s no way to catch it. For this reason it’s often better to generate the definition of XX_MODEL_POINTERS by parsing a .h file somewhere.

    Metaprogramming in C is never easy.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 167k
  • Answers 167k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer What is inside the noscript tag is only run in… May 12, 2026 at 1:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No need to specialize member function. In that answer used… May 12, 2026 at 1:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'd go with a class. A mutable struct is rarely… May 12, 2026 at 1:36 pm

Related Questions

I have a struct that only contains pointers to memory that I've allocated. Is
I'm currently working on a ray-tracer in C# as a hobby project. I'm trying
I am trying to create a vector that contains pointers, each pointer points to
I have class foo that contains a std::auto_ptr member that I would like to
In my C# application, I have a large struct (176 bytes) that is passed

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.