Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8522427
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T07:06:53+00:00 2026-06-11T07:06:53+00:00

I have a switch statement such as the one below: switch (condition) { case

  • 0

I have a switch statement such as the one below:

switch (condition)
{
    case 0:
    case 1:
        // Do Something
        break;
    case 2:
        // Do Something
    case 3:
        // Do Something
        break;
}

I get a compile error telling me that Control cannot fall through from one case label ('case 2:') to another

Well… Yes you can. Because you are doing it from case 0: through to case 1:.

And in fact if I remove my case 2: and it’s associated task, the code compiles and will fall through from case 0: into case1:.

So what is happening here and how can I get my case statements to fall through AND execute some intermediate code?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T07:06:55+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 7:06 am

    There is a difference between stacking labels and fall-through.

    C# supports the former:

    case 0:
    case 1:
        break;
    

    but not fall-through:

    case 2:
        // Do Something
    case 3:
        // Do Something
        break;
    

    If you want fall-through, you need to be explicit:

    case 2:
        // Do Something
        goto case 3;
    case 3:
        // Do Something
        break;
    

    The reasoning is apparent, implicit fall-through can lead to unclean code, especially if you have more than one or two lines, and it isn’t clear how the control flows anymore. By forcing the explicit fall-through, you can easily follow the flow.

    Reference: msdn

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a switch statement similar to this one: switch (number) { case 1:
I have a switch statement that has over 300 case statements. case 'hello': {
I have a switch case statement that doesn't work. I've checked the input, it's
If I have a switch-case statement where the object in the switch is a
Ok here I have a switch case statement which is falling through and trying
I have a rather long switch-case statement. Some of the cases are really short
I have kept hearing this statement. Switch..Case is Evil for code maintenance, but it
I have seen an example with the switch statement where each case block was
I have a switch statement that executes some logic over and over. Rather then
Can I have a switch statement like this: ... switch (temp) { case NW

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.