Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3212920
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T14:53:17+00:00 2026-05-17T14:53:17+00:00

I have a T-Sql Statement as follows; Insert into Table1 Select * From Table2

  • 0

I have a T-Sql Statement as follows;

Insert into Table1
Select * From Table2

I want to know the running sequence. Does the insert waits select statement to finish before starting or it starts asap select statement starts returning values and expects new records from the select statement to continue.

This is a plain stored procedure and no transactions used.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T14:53:18+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:53 pm

    To echo @CodeByMoonlight’s answer, and to address your comment there: the physical considerations (including the specifics of locking) are always subordinate to the logical instructions specified by the query.

    In the processing of an INSERT ... SELECT statement, logically speaking the SELECT is carried out to produce a resultset, and then the rows of this resultset are INSERTed. The fact that in this case the source table and the target table are the same table is irrelevant. I’m fairly sure that specifying NOLOCK or TABLOCK would in any case apply only to the SELECT, if that’s where you position them.

    Consider as another example this statement, which makes no sense if you read it in an ‘imperative’ way:

    UPDATE SomeTable
    SET Column1 = Column2, Column2 = Column1
    

    With an imperative, rather than set-based, understanding, this statement might look as if it will result in Column1 and Column2 having the same value for all rows. But it doesn’t – it in fact swaps the values in Column1 and Column2. Only by understanding that the logical instructions of the query dictate what actually happens can this be seen.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

i have sql statement like this SELECT DISTINCT results_sp_08.material_number FROM results_sp_08 INNER JOIN courses
I have a SQL statement that looks like: SELECT [Phone] FROM [Table] WHERE (
I have the following SQL-statement: SELECT DISTINCT name FROM log WHERE NOT name =
If i have a parameterized SQL statement like this: SELECT * FROM table WHERE
I have a long running SQL statement that I want to run, and no
I have a SQL statement similar to this: SELECT COUNT(*) AS foo, SUM(foo) AS
I have the following SQL Statement. I need to select the latest record for
I am running SQL Server and I have a stored procedure. I want do
Let's say I have an SQL statement that's syntactically and semantically correct so it
I have an annoying SQL statement that seem simple but it looks awfull. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.