Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4017206
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T09:49:59+00:00 2026-05-20T09:49:59+00:00

I have a table in my database with a lot of fields. Most of

  • 0

I have a table in my database with a lot of fields. Most of the time I need all those fields. There is one scenario, however, where I only need a few of the fields, and I am loading a ton of rows.

What I’d like to do is add in an Entity manually, and then simply map it to the original table, but delete the columns I don’t need. I set this all up, but I get the rather self-explanatory error of:

Problem in mapping fragments
…EntitySets ‘FmvHistoryTrimmed’ and
‘FMVHistories’ are both mapped to
table ‘FMVHistory’. Their primary keys
may collide.

Is there some other way I should go about this? Again, most of the time all of the columns are used, so I don’t want to trim down the original entity and put the “extra” fields into a complex type.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T09:50:00+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 9:50 am

    You can’t map two regular entities into same table. You have several choices:

    1. Use table splitting.
    2. Use custom query with projection to non entity type (as @Aducci proposed)
    3. Use QueryView
    4. Use database view or directly DefiningQuery

    Table splitting

    Table splitting allows you to map a table into two entities in 1:1 relation. First entity will contain only PK and subset of fields which you need always. Second entity will contain all other fields and PK. Both entities will contain navigation property to each other. Now if you need only subset of fields you will query first entity. If you need all fields you will query first entity and include navifation property to second entity. You can also lazy load second entity if you need it.

    QueryView

    QueryView is ESQL query defined directly in your mapping (MSL) and it is mapped to new readonly entity type. You can use QueryView to define projection of your full entity into subentity. QueryView must be defined manually in EDMX (it is not available in designer). As I know QueryView is not available in Code first but it is actually the same as custom projection to non entity type.

    DefiningQuery

    DefiningQuery is custom query defined directly in your storage model (SSDL). DefiningQuery is usually used when mapping to database views but you can use it for any custom SQL SELECT. You will map the result of the query to readonly entity type. DefiningQuery must be defined manually in EDMX (it is not available in designer). It is also not directly avaliable in Code first but it is actually the same as calling SqlQuery on DbDatabase. The problem with DefiningQuery is that once you manually define it in SSDL you can’t use Update model from database because this operation replaces complete SSDL and deletes your query definition.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a table in database that is having some fields one of which
I have one database table which contains 8 columns. One of the columns is
I have a tree-style database with the following structure: Table fields: NodeID int ParentID
i have database table like this +-------+--------------+----------+ | id | ip | date |
My database table have a Timestamp column named as inTime and i am using
i have a database table of website links. i have another table of tags,
that my problem: I have database table like that: id (AI) market_id 1 6
I have a database table with some rows that I want to fetch using
I have a database table containing dates (`date` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00').
I have a database table, my goal is to read in each of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.