Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7976335
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T08:53:14+00:00 2026-06-04T08:53:14+00:00

I have a table in my oracle db with 100 columns. 50 columns in

  • 0

I have a table in my oracle db with 100 columns. 50 columns in this table are not used by the program accessing this table. (i.e. the select queries only select the relevant columns and NOT using ‘*’)

My question is this :
If I recreate the same table with only the columns I need will it improve queries performance using the same query I used with the original table (remember that only the relevant columns are selected)

It is well worth mentioning the the program makes these queries a reasonable amount of times per second!

P.S. :
This is an existing project I am working on and the table design was made a long time ago for other products as well (thats why we have unused columns now)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T08:53:15+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 8:53 am

    So the effect of this will be that the average row will be smaller, if the extra columns have got data that will no longer be in the table. Therefore the table can be smaller, and not only will it use less space on disk it will use less memory space in the SGA, and caching will be more efficient.

    Therefore, if you access the table via a full table scan then it will be faster to read the segment, but if you use index-based access mechanisms then the only performance improvement is likely to be through an improved chance of fetching the block from cache.

    [Edited]

    This SO thread suggests “it always pulls a tuple…“. Hence, you are likely to see some performance improvement, not sure major or minor, as already mentioned.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a table like this (Oracle, 10) Account Bookdate Amount 1 20080101 100
I have created a table on an Oracle 10g database with this structure :
I am using oracle 11g and have a table with an XMLType. There are
I have a table with about 100.000 rows that used to look more or
I have a oracle table called: create table InsertHere( generate_id varchar2(10), name varchar2(100) );
Oracle 10g DB. I have a table called s_contact . This table has a
I have the following translation table in an oracle 10g database: ID VARCHAR2(100 BYTE)
I have a query: select min(timestamp) from table This table has 60+million rows, and
I am using hibernate 3 , oracle 10g. I have a table: subject. The
Imagine I have this simple table: Table Name: Table1 Columns: Col1 NUMBER (Primary Key)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.