Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3455906
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:40:17+00:00 2026-05-18T09:40:17+00:00

I have a table on my site where the user has the ability to

  • 0

I have a table on my site where the user has the ability to re-order the rows. This part is easy to do with jQuery UI, and getting the new order back is simple using the $('#sortable').sortable("serialize") method. My question is now, what’s the most efficient way to save all these records in the database, since changing the order of one item changes all the records in the table? I know I could create a new UPDATE statement for each row based on their ID, but I feel like there has to be a better way. Is there?

I’m using MySQL and ASP.NET.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:40:18+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:40 am

    Use the START TRANSACTION command. This is much faster.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have table inside a div tab. The table has 40 rows in it
I have a table with more than a millon rows. This table is used
I have a webpage on my site that displays a table, reloads the XML
I have a small app/site on a dev server with a data table in
I have table rows of data in html being filled from a CGI application.
Imagine I have table like this: id:Product:shop_id 1:Basketball:41 2:Football:41 3:Rocket:45 4:Car:86 5:Plane:86 Now, this
index.php has this jquery code which loads notifications.inc.php into a div on the page
I have a script that appends some rows to a table. One of the
I have a new web app that is packaged as a WAR as part
I have found this example on StackOverflow: var people = new List<Person> { new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.