Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3320346
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T22:55:55+00:00 2026-05-17T22:55:55+00:00

I have a table that essentially stores revisions of certain datasets (i.e. edits back

  • 0

I have a table that essentially stores revisions of certain datasets (i.e. edits back through time if you like). The date of the revision is unimaginatively stored as a datetime field named revision.

Each new revision is taken daily, at midnight.

If this table were left to populate, there would be a set of rows for every single day, where each set of rows shares the same revision datetime field, e.g. 2010-10-31 00:00:00.

I would like to implement a stored procedure as a job that essentially runs daily and cleans up the number of revisions in this table, based on criteria similar to the way the Time Machine features works in OS X. Namely, the revisions to be kept should be:

  • one revision each day in the past week (since weekly revision below)
  • one revision each week for every week after this (the midnight Monday morning revision)
  • one revision each month for revisions beyond a year old (the midnight revision of the first day of the month)

So, for example, right now I would expect to see the following revisions:

  • 2010-10-30 (daily)
  • 2010-10-29 (daily)
  • 2010-10-28 (daily)
  • 2010-10-27 (daily)
  • 2010-10-26 (daily)
  • 2010-10-25 (daily/weekly)
  • 2010-10-18 (weekly)
  • 2010-10-11 (weekly)
  • 2010-10-04 (weekly)
  • 2010-09-27 (weekly)
  • …

That is of course bearing in mind my data set isn’t yet a year old.

So, what’s the best and most concise DELETE FROM to achieve this? Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T22:55:55+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 10:55 pm

    Taking each case

    • Last weeek: simply filter < DATEADD(day, -8, GETDATE()) because no processing is needed. ( allows for time component and assumes clean up runs after midnight)

    • Between week ago and year ago: Use DATEPART(weekday, revision) <> 2. Depends on @@datefirst.

    • More than a year ago: Use DATEPART(day, revision) <> 1

    So, something like but untested…

    DELETE
       MyTable
    WHERE
       Revision < DATEADD(day, -8, GETDATE())
       AND
       (
       Revision > DATEADD(year, -1, GETDATE()) AND DATEPART(weekday, revision) <> 2
       OR --Must be > 1 year ago)
       Revision < DATEPART(month, revision) <> 1)
        )
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a table that looks like that: The rows are sorted by CLNDR_DATE
I have a table that looks something like this: word big expensive smart fast
I have a table that got into the db_owner schema, and I need it
I have a table that contains tasks and I want to give these an
I have a table that has redundant data and I'm trying to identify all
I have a table that records a sequence of actions with a field that
I have a table that is created in a DataList in ASP.Net. This table
I have a table that holds information about cities in a game, you can
I have a table that has an insert trigger on it. If I insert
I have a table that was imported as all UPPER CASE and I would

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.