Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 334063
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T10:01:11+00:00 2026-05-12T10:01:11+00:00

I have a table that must reference another record, but of the same table.

  • 0

I have a table that must reference another record, but of the same table. Here’s an example:

Customer
********
ID
ManagerID (the ID of another customer)
...

I have a bad feeling about doing this. My other idea was to just have a separate table that just stored the relationship.

CustomerRelationship
***************
ID
CustomerID
ManagerID

I feel I may be over complicating such a trivial thing however, I would like to get some idea’s on the best approach for this particular scenario?

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T10:01:11+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 10:01 am

    Why do you have a “bad feeling” about this? It’s perfectly acceptable for a table to reference its own primary key. Introducing a secondary table only increases the complexity of your queries and negatively impacts performance.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have one table that has sales records and another table that has additional
I have table that I insert data with following query (from c# code): INSERT
I have table that contain date and time field. id|date|time ========= 1|01/01/2001|10:45 2|01/02/2002|11:45 3|01/03/2003|12:45
I have a table that stores user information. The table has a userid (identity)
I have a table that has an AUTO_INCREMENT field. Currently, it is also a
I have a table that's created like this: CREATE TABLE bin_test (id INTEGER PRIMARY
We have a table that is used for assessment-values in our tool where each
I have a table that has three different date columns, so I set each
I have a table that potentially will have high number of inserts per second,
I have a table that has records with a structure similar to this.. ID

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.