Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4554162
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T17:03:05+00:00 2026-05-21T17:03:05+00:00

I have a table with a composite Primary Key, arranged something like this: CREATE

  • 0

I have a table with a composite Primary Key, arranged something like this:

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[mytable]
(
    [some_id] [smallint] NOT NULL,
    [order_seq] [smallint] NOT NULL,
    -- etc...
)

Both of these columns are part of the primary key (it’s actually a 4-part PK on the real table, but I’ve simplified it for the sake of the example). None of the columns are identities. I’m writing a stored proc that inserts a new record at the next order_seq for a given some_id:

CREATE PROCEDURE some_proc
(
    @some_id smallint,
    @newSeq smallint OUTPUT
)
AS
BEGIN
    insert into mytable (some_id, order_seq)
    values 
    (
         @some_id, 
         (select max(order_seq) + 1 from mytable where some_id = @some_id)
    )

    set @newSeq = /* order_seq of the newly-inserted row */
END

I need to know how to set @newSeq. I’d like to avoid running a select query after the insert, because I don’t want to run into concurrency issues — I’m prohibited from locking the table or using a transaction (don’t ask).

As far as I know, I can’t use SCOPE_IDENTITY() because none of the columns is an identity. How can I set newSeq correctly?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T17:03:05+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 5:03 pm

    First, if the PK contains four columns, then each insert must include all four columns. Second, you could look into the Output clause if you are using SQL Server 2005+

    Declare @NewSeqTable Table( Order_Seq int not null )
    
    Insert MyTable( some_id, order_seq, otherPkCol, otherPkCol2 )
    Output inserted.order_seq Into @NewSeqTable
    Select @some_id, Max( order_seq ) + 1, otherPkCol, otherPkCol2
    From MyTable
    Where some_id = @some_id
    
    Select Order_Seq
    From @NewSeqTable
    

    OUTPUT Clause (Transact-SQL)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have table structures that include a composite primary key of id & revision
I have a table called table1 which has a composite primary key using 'ScreenId'
Imagine I have table like this: id:Product:shop_id 1:Basketball:41 2:Football:41 3:Rocket:45 4:Car:86 5:Plane:86 Now, this
I have a table with a primary key that is a varchar(255). Some cases
I have a project table with projectId as primary key: **projectId**, projectName, dateCreated, etc.
Is it better to have a single primary key, or use composite primary keys
I have two tables one has a three column composite key. The other needs
I have table with 50 entries (users with such details like Name Surname Location
I have a table with more than a millon rows. This table is used
I have a table with a structure like the following: LocationID AccountNumber long-guid-here 12345

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.