Home/ Questions/Q 9190917
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-17T20:33:59+00:00

I have a TCP client program and which needs to communicate with servers embedded

  • 0

I have a TCP client program and which needs to communicate with servers embedded in devices.
There can be 1000’s of devices which need to be controlled through the single client program. Since the number of these devices (i.e. tcp servers) is large, so they have to be behind different routers

so the scenerio is like

client —– “router1”—-server1, server 2, server3…server_255

   ----- "router2" ---server1, server 2...server_255

enter image description here

Since client and server programs are in different networks, so which is the most easiest way to establish communication between client and the servers?

Though it seems simple client-server programming, but the issue is with the NAT , networking translation here. The servers are behind a different private networks
So I am looking forward for resolving the NAT problem here. (e.g. like port forwarding, but not sure)

Note: My client and devices are still in my network, so security is not a main concern.

Many Thanks in advance.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Your illustration shows multiple endpoints behind each NAT-based router. If you’re using a port-forwarding approach, then you’ll need to register a different port number for each endpoint in your various routers. It would be a pain to track and configure, but would allow your central management server instant access to each of your endpoints.

    If you control the software on your endpoints, you can have them poll a central server for instructions. No configuration would be needed in the routers because the requests originate from the private side. The amount of traffic would be trivial, assuming the typical message from the server is something like “OK”. The downside is that delivery of an instruction by the central server wouldn’t be instantaneous. The client won’t know a message is available until its next polling interval.

    Somewhere between the two extremes, but at an added cost, is a distributed management approach. If you already have a server behind each NAT router, you can have it relay instructions to each of the endpoints. Your central management server can control a small handful of local management servers, one behind each NAT firewall, and each of those servers will have direct access to the endpoints within its same LAN.

    • 0