Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6621845
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T21:19:27+00:00 2026-05-25T21:19:27+00:00

I have a template class that is taking in a couple of types. One

  • 0

I have a template class that is taking in a couple of types. One type is there just to determine policies. That class determines how a function may work in certain cases.

Let’s say this is one of the function:

/* this code is part of a class */

    template <typename T, typename T_Policy> // Not important but just showing the template parameters of the class

    void Allocate(unsigned int numElements)
    {
      // Some code here
      while (someCondition) // Other functions don't have the loop, this is just an example
      {
        // Some code here

        if (T_Policy::trackElements) { /* some code here */ }
        if (T_Policy::verbose) { /* some code here */ }
        if (T_Policy::customManager) { /* some code here */ }
        /* and a few other policies */
      }
      // Some more code here
    }

I would like the lines of code that are using the policies to be compiled out instead of relying on if statements. One obvious way is to put the while loop in overloaded functions each taking a dummy object with a specific policy type. But that means a lot of code duplication. Similar approaches with template specialization will result in code duplication as well.

Is there a way to compile out the code without code duplication?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T21:19:27+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 9:19 pm

    You can always change code

       if (T_Policy::trackElements) { /* some code here */ }
    

    into

    template <bool b>
    void trackElementPhase() {
      /* some code here */
    }
    
    template <>
    void trackElementPhase<false>() {} // empty body
    
     ... later in the code
    
         trackElementPhase<T_Policy::track_elements>();
    

    Of course T_Policy::track_elements has to be compile time constant for this.

    However, I wouldn’t bother. The compiler is likely clever enough to optimize out code in

       if (T_Policy::trackElements) { /* some code here */ }
    

    if the condition is compile time constant.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a template class with a variadic template member function that I am
I have the following use case: There's a class called Template and with that
I have a template class that is only valid for couple of template parameters:
I want to have a template class that looks something like what I have
I have a template class method like that: template<class T> static tmpClass<T>* MakeInstance(T value)
I have a custom iterator template class that wraps up a std::list iterator. In
I have a templated container class that looks something like this: template <class ItemType>
I have code that looks like this: template<class T> class list { public: class
I have a xml that looks like below <xsl:template match=//xml> <xsl:for-each select=//z:row> <ul class
say we have a struct template taking a class , and a pointer on

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.