Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3940344
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T00:24:26+00:00 2026-05-20T00:24:26+00:00

I have a terribly uncomplicated test program that prints out the following numbers. i.e.

  • 0

I have a terribly uncomplicated test program that prints out the following numbers.

i.e.

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
  struct statvfs vfs;
  statvfs(argv[1], &vfs);
  printf("f_bsize (block size): %lu\n"
       "f_frsize (fragment size): %lu\n"
       "f_blocks (size of fs in f_frsize units): %lu\n"
       "f_bfree (free blocks): %lu\n"
       "f_bavail free blocks for unprivileged users): %lu\n"
       "f_files (inodes): %lu\n"
       "f_ffree (free inodes): %lu\n"
       "f_favail (free inodes for unprivileged users): %lu\n"
       "f_fsid (file system ID): %lu\n"
       "f_flag (mount flags): %lu\n"
       "f_namemax (maximum filename length)%lu\n",
       vfs.f_bsize,
       vfs.f_frsize,
       vfs.f_blocks,
       vfs.f_bfree,
       vfs.f_bavail,
       vfs.f_files,
       vfs.f_ffree,
       vfs.f_favail,
       vfs.f_fsid,
       vfs.f_flag,
       vfs.f_namemax);

       return 0;
    }

Prints out:

f_bsize (block size): 4096
f_frsize (fragment size): 4096
f_blocks (size of fs in f_frsize units): 10534466
f_bfree (free blocks): 6994546
f_bavail free blocks for unprivileged users): 6459417
f_files (inodes): 2678784
f_ffree (free inodes): 2402069
f_favail (free inodes for unprivileged users): 2402069
f_fsid (file system ID): 12719298601114463092
f_flag (mount flags): 4096
f_namemax (maximum filename length)255

df prints out for the root fs:

Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5             42137864  14159676  25837672  36% /

But here is where I’m confused.

25837672+14159676 != 42137846 (actually 39997348)

Therefore if I were to do the calc 14159676 / 42137864 * 100 I get 33% not 36% as df prints.

But if I calc

14159676 / 39997348 * 100 I get 35%.

Why all the discrepencies and where is df getting the number 42137864? Is it related to some conversion to 1k blocks vs the actual system block size which is 4k?

This will be integrated into my caching app to tell me when the drive is at some threshold… e.g. 90% before I start freeing fixed size blocks that are sized in 2^n sizing.
So what I’m after is a function that gives me a reasonably accurate %used.

EDIT:
I can now match what df prints. Except for the %Used. It makes we wonder how accurate all this is. What is the fragment size?

unsigned long total = vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long available = vfs.f_bavail * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long free = vfs.f_bfree * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;

printf("Total: %luK\n", total);
printf("Available: %luK\n", available);
printf("Used: %luK\n", total - free);

EDIT2:

unsigned long total = vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long available = vfs.f_bavail * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long free = vfs.f_bfree * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long used = total - free;

printf("Total: %luK\n", total);
printf("Available: %luK\n", available);
printf("Used: %luK\n", used);
printf("Free: %luK\n", free);

// Calculate % used based on f_bavail not f_bfree.  This is still giving out a different answer to df???
printf("Use%%: %f%%\n",  (vfs.f_blocks - vfs.f_bavail) / (double)(vfs.f_blocks) * 100.0); 

f_bsize (block size): 4096
f_frsize (fragment size): 4096
f_blocks (size of fs in f_frsize units): 10534466
f_bfree (free blocks): 6994182
f_bavail (free blocks for unprivileged users): 6459053
f_files (inodes): 2678784
f_ffree (free inodes): 2402056
f_favail (free inodes for unprivileged users): 2402056
f_fsid (file system ID): 12719298601114463092
f_flag (mount flags): 4096
f_namemax (maximum filename length)255
Total: 42137864K
Available: 25836212K
Used: 14161136K
Free: 27976728K
Use%: 38.686470%

matth@kubuntu:~/dev$ df
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5             42137864  14161136  25836212  36% /

I get 38% not 36. If calculated by f_bfree I get 33%. Is df wrong or is this just never going to be accurate? If this is the case then I want to lean on the side of being conservative.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T00:24:26+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 12:24 am

    df‘s data may be based on f_bavail, not f_bfree. You may find it helpful to look at the source code to df to see how it does things. It has a number of edge cases it needs to deal with (eg, when the used space exceeds the amount of space available to non-root users), but the relevant code for the normal case is here:

      uintmax_t u100 = used * 100;
      uintmax_t nonroot_total = used + available;
      pct = u100 / nonroot_total + (u100 % nonroot_total != 0);
    

    In other words, 100 * used / (used + available), rounded up. Plugging in the values from your df output gives 100 * 14159676 / (14159676 + 25837672) = 35.4015371, which rounded up is 36%, just as df calculated.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.