Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8984797
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T21:11:37+00:00 2026-06-15T21:11:37+00:00

I have a test case here where I think I covered pretty much every

  • 0

I have a test case here where I think I covered pretty much every requirement I could find in the docs to enable viewing the grid row form like when selected in this example. I’m probably too deep into this now but I get no javascript errors/warnings at all to follow up…

I should doubleclick a record and get to view the gridrow but it’s blackhole-ing me. I could use some fresh eyes on this issue. Nor the pager icon nor doubleclick seems to work.

Can anyone help me on my way? thanks for any help. If the code does error out when you try it I’m in the middle of trying something out, so I will make sure it’s syntax checks out when done.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T21:11:38+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 9:11 pm

    First of all I recommend you to replace jquery.jqGrid.js file which is minimized version of jqGrid 4.1.1 to jquery.jqGrid.src.js from the current jqGrid 4.4.1. In general you should always try to reproduce the same problem in jquery.jqGrid.src.js if you have it in jquery.jqGrid.min.js. jqGrid will be permanently changed, many bug fixes will be fixed and new features will be added. For example jqGrid 4.3.3 have fixed wrong calculation of the grid width in Google Chrome version >=19 described here. It was implemented fixes to support current versions of jQuery 1.6 and many many other things. The version jqGrid 4.1.1 is almost two years old, which is really much in the world of web.

    Additionally I would recommend you never use afterInsertRow and always use gridview: true. The reason is the performance of the grid. It’s very important to understand that working with elements on the page (the DOM elements) should be other organized as with any other variables known in the computer language. The reason is that if you make changes of one element on the page web browser have to recalculate position style etc of all existing elements on the page. At least the web browser have to verify all elements whether there need be changed. One names such procedure web browser reflow. I recommend you to read the answer where I describe the problem more details. In the same way you should try to reduce any loops in loadComplete or gridComplete where you enumerate all rows and make changes in many rows. In the way the performance of the grid will be reduced in many times. If you would use another style of writing the program it will be exactly clean and good to understand as before and it could work much quickly. In the answer for example you could find one real example of such transformation of the code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a simple unit test case (extensive question here ) on a configuration
I am creating a traceability matrix for PRD. I have test case _id which
I have this test case def setUp(self): self.user = User.objects.create(username=tauri, password='gaul') def test_loginin_student_control_panel(self): c
I have a collection testcase like this, Test Builds have many Test Case Logs
I have the following test case: @ContextConfiguration(/spring/test-context.xml) @TransactionConfiguration(transactionManager=txManager) @Transactional() public class MyEntityDaoTestCase extends AbstractJUnit4SpringContextTests
I have a simple test case failing in Django: Model (app/models.py): from django.db import
I have the following test case in my iOS application : -(void) testTwoDefaultUsersExist {
today I have coded a test case for my application, to see how transactions
I have written a ScalaCheck test case within Specs2. The test case gives up
I have created a model test case in a plugin. Plugin name: Filters and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.