Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3339782
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T00:31:56+00:00 2026-05-18T00:31:56+00:00

I have a third party service which have async DoAsync() operation and Done() event.

  • 0

I have a third party service which have async DoAsync() operation and Done() event. How can I create my own sync DoSync() operation?
I want smth like this (in pseudocode):

operation DoSync()
{
    DoAsync();
    wait until Done();
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T00:31:56+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 12:31 am

    One way to do this is to temporarily add an event handler, and in that handler, set some sort of waitable object. Here’s an example that shows the technique with one of the async methods provided by WebClient

    using System;
    using System.Net;
    using System.Threading;
    
    namespace ConsoleApplication1
    {
        class Program
        {
            static void Main(string[] args)
            {
                WebClient w = new WebClient();
    
                using (var waiter = new ManualResetEventSlim())
                {
                    DownloadDataCompletedEventHandler h = (sender, e) =>
                    {
                        if (e.Error != null)
                        {
                            Console.WriteLine(e.Error);
                        }
                        waiter.Set();
                    };
    
                    w.DownloadDataCompleted += h;
                    try
                    {
                        w.DownloadDataAsync(new Uri("http://www.interact-sw.co.uk/iangblog/"));
                        Console.WriteLine("Downloading");
                        waiter.Wait();
                        Console.WriteLine("Finished!");
                    }
                    finally
                    {
                        w.DownloadDataCompleted -= h;
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
    

    Here’s a simplified version that makes the basic technique easier to see, but which doesn’t bother with things like error handling, or tidying up after itself:

    WebClient w = new WebClient();
    
    using (var waiter = new ManualResetEventSlim())
    {
        w.DownloadDataCompleted += delegate { waiter.Set(); };
        w.DownloadDataAsync(new Uri("http://www.interact-sw.co.uk/iangblog/"));
        Console.WriteLine("Downloading");
        waiter.Wait();
        Console.WriteLine("Finished!");
    }
    

    In most situations you will want to make sure you detect errors, and detach the handler when you’re done – I just provided the shorter version to help illustrate the point. I wouldn’t actually use that simplified one in a real program.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.