Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3235196
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T17:28:44+00:00 2026-05-17T17:28:44+00:00

I have a thread which creates COM objects that use the STA model. This

  • 0

I have a thread which creates COM objects that use the STA model.

This thread’s Run function puts it in an infinite WaitForMultipleObjects.

Is it possible that the infinite WaitForMultipleObjects could prevent other threads from marshaling calls to the COM objects owned by this thread?

Basically, I’m asking if WaitForMultipleObjects would prevent the hidden COM message queue from being pumped.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T17:28:45+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 5:28 pm

    Yes, problems are possible – see this KB article. Basically if your thread is an STA thread it should not call functions that can block for long periods of time since while the thread is blocked it doesn’t pump and dispatch messages and this can prevent proper marshalling functioning.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

i have this thread which run as a service: public void run() { try
I have a parent thread (non-UI) which creates some child threads to do some
I have a parent thread (non-UI) which creates some child threads to do some
I have a fairly straightforward Java class here which creates 2 thread pools.... Connects
I have a thread which needs to be run in the background every 1000ms.
I have an app which creates a thread which communicate with the main UI
I have a object which contains unicode data and I want to use that
I have this simple code: public void Run() { var invokerThread = new Thread(new
I have a C# application which uses a COM component. This COM component require
I have an application where i have created a thread which must check the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.