Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8068601
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T12:44:41+00:00 2026-06-05T12:44:41+00:00

I have a timer that performs an operation on a property if it is

  • 0

I have a timer that performs an operation on a property if it is not nil, but between checking for nil and performing the operation, an event sets the property to nil. There are in fact several events all of which could set the property to nil. There are also other properties that the timer is checking that are in the same boat.

What’s the most elegant and scalable way to resolve this?

  1. Wrap every use of the property in a synchronized block?
  2. Set/release a lock at the beginning of the timer and check wait for the lock in each event?
  3. Something else?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T12:44:43+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 12:44 pm

    I’m not too sure on your exact situation but you might want to consider writing a custom setter to the property that will cancel the timer when it is set to nil?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a timer that needs to not process its elapsed event handler at
In my current situation I have a class that performs an operation synchronously. During
I have a timer that ticks every 3 seconds. If the timer found something
I have a repeating timer that runs down a clock. During the clock running
I have a timer tick that I would like to kick off my backgroundworker
I have an array an a timer that adds a new object to my
i need a timer that works like this : imagine somebody have a limit
i have a question , i have this timer code in java that when
I have a aspx page that has a UpdatePanel and a asp timer. the
I have a project that uses a System.Timers.Timer to update the position of motors.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.