Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7523809
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T02:54:35+00:00 2026-05-30T02:54:35+00:00

I have a TreeSet which contains > 100k objects. I have another method which

  • 0

I have a TreeSet which contains > 100k objects.
I have another method which requires ArrayList as an param.

Is there any way I can accomplish this without iterating whole TreeSet and then adding each object manually to ArrayList ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T02:54:37+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 2:54 am

    How about this:

    new ArrayList<T>(set);
    

    For Java 7 and later, this can be simplified, as type arguments <T> can be replaced with diamond type <>:

    new ArrayList<>(set);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any constraint onto compareTo method which orders objects put into the standard
I have 3 different TreeSet objects in my application, all of which store the
I have a TreeSet, which will be full of integers. To make a long
Have you ever seen any of there error messages? -- SQL Server 2000 Could
I have a SortedSet defined this way: SortedSet<RatedMessage> messageCollection = new TreeSet<RatedMessage>(new Comp()); and
I know a java treeset can't have identical elements and so I have to
I am wondering what is the best way, given a TreeSet of Date objects,
I have a set of objects which I cannot modify by overriding their equals
If I have a method that is to return a TreeSet of integers how
Is there a way to copy a TreeSet ? That is, is it possible

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.