Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7674891
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T16:50:16+00:00 2026-05-31T16:50:16+00:00

I have a try catch and finally block like this. Client client = new

  • 0

I have a try catch and finally block like this.

Client client = new Client();
try {
   ...
}
catch {
   ...
}
finally {
   client = null;
}

I would like to ask if client = null is necessary to wipe out memory use for client object if exception occurs.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T16:50:17+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 4:50 pm

    Whenever an object has no references to it for any reason then it becomes eligible for garbage collection, including if a variable goes out of scope as a result of the program leaving a function or statement block. In other words, no.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So I have this function: (define (try try-block catch-block finally-block) ; Implements try/catch/finally like
I have a Try Catch in my code. I would like to know if
I have a method that looks like this: try { doStuff(); } catch (Exception
so in my program I have parts where I use try catch blocks like
I have a method, which has a try/catch/finaly block inside. Within the try block,
I have often come across situations like :- try{ ... stmts ... } catch(Exception
I have used try-catch/except-finally variants in many languages for years, today someone asked me
I have some critical logic in a finally block (with an empty try block),
If I have a method like the following can I omit the catch block
I have the following code: try { FileStream FS = new FileStream(this.InFile, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read);

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.