I have a two properties which holds lists. Whenever any item in this list changes, I would like the other list to update itself. This includes the statement obj.myProp[3]=5. Right now, this statement calls the getter function to get the whole list, gets the third item from the list, and sets that to 5. the myProp list is changed, but the second list never gets updated.
class Grid(object):
def __init__(self,width=0,height=0):
# Make self._rows a multi dimensional array
# with it's size width * height
self._rows=[[None] * height for i in xrange(width)]
# Make `self._columns` a multi dimensional array
# with it's size height * width
self._columns=[[None] * width for i in xrange(height)]
@property
def rows(self):
# Getting the rows of the array
return self._rows
@rows.setter
def rows(self, value):
# When the rows are changed, the columns are updated
self._rows=value
self._columns=self._flip(value)
@property
def columns(self):
# Getting the columns of the array
return self._columns
@columns.setter
def columns(self, value):
# When the columns are changed, the rows are updated
self._columns = value
self._rows = self._flip(value)
@staticmethod
def _flip(args):
# This flips the array
ans=[[None] * len(args) for i in xrange(len(args[0]))]
for x in range(len(args)):
for y in range(len(args[0])):
ans[y][x] = args[x][y]
return ans
Example run:
>>> foo=grid(3,2)
>>> foo.rows
[[None, None], [None, None], [None, None]]
>>> foo.columns
[[None, None, None], [None, None, None]]
>>> foo.rows=[[1,2,3],[10,20,30]]
>>> foo.rows
[[1, 2, 3], [10, 20, 30]]
>>> foo.columns
[[1, 10], [2, 20], [3, 30]]
>>> foo.rows[0][0]=3
>>> foo.rows
[[3, 2, 3], [10, 20, 30]]
>>> foo.columns
[[1, 10], [2, 20], [3, 30]]
If you look at the last three lines, this is where the actual problem occurs. I set the first item of the sublist to three, but foo.columns never updates itself to put the 3 in its list.
So in short, how do I make a variable that always updates another variable, even when it’s subitem is being changed?
I’m using Python 2.7
Your problem is that you’re not setting
foo.rowson the offending line – you’re getting it, and then modifying one of it’s members. This isn’t going to fire the setter. With the API you’re proposing, you would need to return a list that has getters and setters attached as well.You’d do better to not use the rows and columns properties to set entries, and add a
__getitem__method like this:The broken line then becomes: