Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6975733
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T17:24:23+00:00 2026-05-27T17:24:23+00:00

i have a type class Foo { public string Name { get; set; }

  • 0

i have a type

 class Foo 
 {
   public string Name { get; set; }
 }

and i can serialize it quickly with JsonConvert.SerializeObject() method (without custom settings). But if i decorate class definition with [DataContract] property Name is not serialized.

Is there a way to serialize DataContract Foo type WITHOUT decorating it with additional Newtonsoft.Json specific attributes?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T17:24:24+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 5:24 pm

    Try annotating the property with the DataMember Attribute:

    [DataContract]
    class Foo 
    {
        [DataMember]
        public string Name { get; set; }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given the class: public class Foo { public string Name { get; set; }
I have some custom type: [RdfSerializable] public class Item { [RdfProperty(true)] public string Name
I have something like this: public class Foo { public Bar[] Bars{get; set;} }
I have the following code: public class MyElement { String name; String type; MyElement(String
I have an class public class Foo { public int UserId { get; set;
So I have a custom type Foo : public class Foo { public string
I have simple type Question : public class Question { public string[] Tags {
I have a class Foo that a property of the type Bar. public class
Let's say I have a type: public class Transformer<T, TResult> where T : IMessage
I have an object, c , of type Class (I get hold of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.