Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6342941
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T20:20:29+00:00 2026-05-24T20:20:29+00:00

I have a type type T s r a = StateT [s] (ListT (Reader

  • 0

I have a type

type T s r a = StateT [s] (ListT (Reader r)) a

I’d like to create a monadic value that yields each of the current states

states :: T a r a

But I’m feeling stupid today, and I can’t figure out how to transform a value of T a r [a] to T a r a.

states = do
  as <- get
  -- insert magic
  return a
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T20:20:31+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:20 pm

    Figured a way out

    states = do
      as <- get
      a <- lift . ListT $ return as
      return a
    

    Which can be compacted down to

    states = get >>= lift . ListT . return
    

    ok, feel smarter now

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read the documentation that states that "given the type of the enum,
Assume you have a type like the following: struct Value(int v_) { static const
I have a type and an interface and I need to verify that the
I have some types that extend a common type, and these are my models.
Like the title states, does anyone out there have a clear way to implement
In my schema I have some types that simply extend a simple XSD type
I have a list of objects (of type 'TrackedSet') that is data bound to
I have a function that creates a state. A state is defined as: type
My problem is HTML and CSS related. I have a hierarchy type structure that
Let's say I have type A, and a derived type B. When I perform

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.