Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6997383
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T20:16:36+00:00 2026-05-27T20:16:36+00:00

I have a unit test class Tester ; I want it to access private

  • 0

I have a unit test class Tester; I want it to access private fields of a Working class.

class Working {
    // ...
    private:
    int m_variable;
};

class Tester {
    void testVariable() {
        Working w;
        test( w.m_variable );
    }
}

I have the following options:

  • make m_variable public – ugly
  • make method test_getVariable() – overcomplicated
  • add friend class Tester to Working – then Working “knows” about the Tester explicitly, which is not good

My ideal would be

class Working {
    // ...
    private:
    int m_variable;

    friend class TestBase;
};

class TestBase {};

class Tester : public TestBase {
    void testVariable() {
        Working w;
        test( w.m_variable );
    }
}

where Working knows about TestBase but not each test… but it does not work. Apparently friendship does not work with inheritance.

What would be the most elegant solution here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T20:16:37+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:16 pm

    Generally, your unit tests should not evaluate private variables. Write your tests to the interface, not the implementation.

    If you really need to check that a private variable has a particular characteristic, consider using assert() rather than trying to write a unit test for it.

    A longer answer (written for C# rather than C++, but the same principles apply) is at https://stackoverflow.com/a/1093481/436641.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a unit test (example is modified Test::Unit documentation ) require 'test/unit' class
I am writing some unit test and I have a unit testing base class
I have a unit test which contains the following line of code Site.objects.get(name=UnitTest).delete() and
I have a static class representing a connection pool that I want to unit
Imagine we have a class like this: class Testee { public: void Func() private:
I have problem organizing my unittest based class test for family of tests. For
I have a unit test that works fine locally but when uploaded to TeamCity
I have a unit test where I have statically defined a quite large byte
I have a unit test that creates a mock calls my method to be
I have a unit test where I run a method for every item in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.