Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6667759
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T02:58:02+00:00 2026-05-26T02:58:02+00:00

I have a User class. One of the properties needs to be an associated

  • 0

I have a User class. One of the properties needs to be an “associated” user, so it’s type needs to be User. Right now when I initialize the class, I get a stack overflow when it tries to initialize the Associated property. Current code:

public class User {
    public User() {
        this.Associated = new User();
    }

    public User Associated { get; set; }
}

Is this doable or am I barking up the wrong tree?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T02:58:03+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:58 am

    You could use a lazy loaded method for your aggregated User class and not initialize it in the constructor:

    public class User {
        private User _user;
    
        public User Associated 
        { 
            get
            {
                if (_user == null)
                    _user = new User();
                return _user;
            }
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class User with one field called birthDate which is a java.sql.Date
I have multiple datepickers in one page. I user class name to set the
In one of my applications I have a class which is responsible for user
it's possible to have one entity object (class, e.g. User) for more entity models
I have two models: User (email:string) Profile (name:string) class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :profile
I have a relationship like this class User include Mongoid::Document include Mongoid::Timestamps embeds_one :setting
If I have the following has_one setup: class Account has_one :user How can I
i have a User class with a field for the e-mail-address and a password.
Alright so here is the question. I have a user class which contains a
I have a user class in EF Code First that contains a lot of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.