Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 894635
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T14:25:29+00:00 2026-05-15T14:25:29+00:00

I have a User model that has_many :posts. If I wanted to make a

  • 0

I have a User model that has_many :posts. If I wanted to make a named_scope for finding users with at least one post would this be correct?

   named_scope :at_least_one_post, :joins => :posts, :group => "users.id"

or should I take it a step further and do

   named_scope :at_least_one_post, :joins => :posts, :group => "users.id", :having => "COUNT(posts.id) > 0"
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T14:25:30+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:25 pm

    Actually I don’t think it is necessary to group or add the condition. Because you are using the :joins, that will do an INNER JOIN and will therefore only pull users with posts. If you were going to do an :include, that would LEFT JOIN and you would need to add a HAVING clause.

    So all you should need is

    named_scope :at_least_one_post, :joins => :posts
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say we have a User Model that has many Posts. The Posts Model
I have a User class that has many posts and the post class has
I am building a model which keeps track of posts that a given user
I have posts that can be voted on by a polymorphic association. Now I
I have a Rails app with an Order and a Refund model. Order has_many
I have a form that creates a new brand. The user chooses a name,
I did find some questions on SO about Rails associations that are somewhat like
I'm new to rails and testing and have a problem with loading my fixtures.
I'm building a site with CakePHP, but this question is more about solving an
Please excuse my english, I'm still trying to master it. I've started to learn

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.