Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7765479
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T15:10:35+00:00 2026-06-01T15:10:35+00:00

I have a utility class that needs to work on a generic Class but

  • 0

I have a utility class that needs to work on a generic Class but must be restricted to those that are an enum and implement a particular interface.

// These two work
Class<? extends Enum<?>> enumClass;
Class<? extends MyInterface> interfaceClass;

// This is what I want but does not work
Class<? extends MyInterface & Enum<?>> enumAndInterfaceClass;

For generics I can successfully use this

public class MyClass<T extends Enum<T> & MyInterface> {
    public MyClass(Class<T> theClass) {
        ...
    }
}

However I can’t use the Generics everywhere and need to declare it separately. I am not sure if this is even possible.

So my question boils down to how can I declare a member variable with those constraints?

So Currently MyClass is a singleton then as needed the enum/interface can be updated. The return values of its operations will change depending on which enum it is given. I would like to not have the generics on it since that would require creating a new instance for every change to the enum. There is a lot of code using it already so deviating from the singleton is not going to be approved. So a reference must be kept. I suppose I could only enforce the Interface requirement then check in the setter method that it is an enum throwing an exception otherwise but that is not ideal.

Edit (Updated question and added more detail)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T15:10:36+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 3:10 pm

    As far as I remember, you can only declare intersection types (this is what & creates) for type parameters of classes and methods. You can not declare a local variable with an intersection type directly; you can create such variables with the aid of a class or method type parameter, as seen in the answer of milkplusvellocet.

    See the JLS reference in this answer to a similar question:
    https://stackoverflow.com/a/6643378/282229

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a utility class that creates & returns a db connection: Public Shared
We have a static method in a utility class that will download a file
Anyone have a suggestion for a good utility class that maps values from one
I have a class with only class methods (utility stuff), so my interface is
I have created a utility method that contains some try/catches in it. In those
I have a vb.net 3.5 class library project that needs to reference two assemblies
I have a class that needs access to urllib2, the trivial example for me
I have written the following Utility class to get an instance of any class
I got a Utility module since VB.NET doesn't have static class like C# and
I have a utility (grep) that gives me a list of filenames and a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.