Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 82499
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:37:35+00:00 2026-05-10T21:37:35+00:00

I have a (varchar) field Foo which can only be specified if (bit) Bar

  • 0

I have a (varchar) field Foo which can only be specified if (bit) Bar is not true. I would like the textbox in which Foo is displayed to be disabled when Bar is true — essentially, FooBox.Enabled = !isBar. I’m trying to do something like

FooBox.DataBindings.Add(new Binding('Enabled', source, '!isBar')); 

but of course the bang in there throws an exception. I’ve also tried constructs like ‘isBar != true’ or ‘isBar <> true’, but none work. Am I barking up the wrong tree here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:37:36+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:37 pm

    I tried doing something like this a while ago and the best I could come up with was either

    a) Changing the source class to also have a NotBar property and bind to that

    b) Make a dumb wrapper class around source that has a NotBar property and bind to that.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a varchar field that contains a string like 10,11,12,13. How can I
I have a varchar field that looks like (sadly I have no control over
I have a varchar field in my database which i use for two significantly
I have an SQL Server 2005 table that has a varchar(250) field which contains
I have a field type varchar in sql server. It contains data like 010109
I have the field receiptno , which is a varchar holding a numeric value,
I have a table foo with a varchar field text where some rows are
I have a table with a name (varchar) field that only holds numeric string
If you have a varchar field you can easily do SELECT * FROM TABLE
hi all i have a field ammount in mysql database which have varchar(50) type.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.