Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3443536
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T08:48:12+00:00 2026-05-18T08:48:12+00:00

I have a very complicated class(it has unordered_map and so on on inside it)

  • 0

I have a very complicated class(it has unordered_map and so on on inside it) and I want to share an object of it withit two my processes. Can I simply pass just a pointer to it from one process to another? I think, no, but hope to hear “Yes!”.

If “no”, I’d be grateful to see any links how to cope in such cases.
I need to have only one instance of this object for all processes because it’s very large and all of the processes will work woth it for read only.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T08:48:13+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 8:48 am

    No, process do not (naturally) share memory. If boost is an option, so you can have a look on Boost.Interprocess for easy memory sharing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Im having a very strange problem, i have a complicated view that returns incorrect
I have very strange behaviour of Java Date class: System.out.println(new Date().toGMTString()); long l =
what I mean by that is: I basically have a class that has too
I have a very standard CRUD app in Rails & Jquery Mobile with two
PHP's DateTime class has the two methods add() and sub() to add or subtract
I have an application that contains a main Activity, which has a very simple
I have a very complicated problem that occurs only for non-admin windows user. I
OK. I have a very long and pretty complicated function. It looks almost like
I have very simple window where I have 2 buttons - one for cancel,
I have very little experience with ASP.NET and I am doing some self-training before

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.