Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 153875
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T09:52:43+00:00 2026-05-11T09:52:43+00:00

I have a very large array which must be 262144 elements in length (and

  • 0

I have a very large array which must be 262144 elements in length (and potentially much larger in future). I have tried allocating the array on the stack like so:

#define SIZE 262144 int myArray[SIZE]; 

However, it appears that when I try and add elements past a certain point, the values are different when I try to access them. I understand that this is because there is only a finite amount of memory on the stack, as opposed to the heap which has more memory.

I have tried the following without much luck (does not compile):

#define SIZE 262144 int *myArray[SIZE] = new int[SIZE]; 

And then I considered using malloc, but I was wondering if there was a more C++ like way of doing this…

#define SIZE 262144 int *myArray = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int) * SIZE); 

Should I just go with malloc?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T09:52:44+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:52 am

    You’ll want to use new like such:

    int *myArray = new int[SIZE]; 

    I’ll also mention the other side of this, just in case….

    Since your transitioning from the stack to the heap, you’ll also need to clean this memory up when you’re done with it. On the stack, the memory will automatically cleanup, but on the heap, you’ll need to delete it, and since its an array, you should use:

    delete [] myArray; 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 100k
  • Answers 100k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I am sorry, this code works fine there was some… May 11, 2026 at 7:59 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The contract of the show method in Haskell is that… May 11, 2026 at 7:59 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You get it by calling myMap.keySet().iterator(); You shouldn't even need… May 11, 2026 at 7:59 pm

Related Questions

I have a very complex MySQL query that includes use of the same subquery
I am in dilemma, do not know which one is better. (I am using
I'm struggling to create a generic (or untyped) array in C (I'm aware that
I have a PHP script which reads a large CSV and performs certain actions,

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.