Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9135657
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T08:51:11+00:00 2026-06-17T08:51:11+00:00

I have a very large collection of objects in node.js (millions) that I need

  • 0

I have a very large collection of objects in node.js (millions) that I need to keep in memory for caching purposes (they are maintained in several global hash objects). Each hash collections stores about 750k keys.

In order to keep GC to a minimum, I want to find out the best way to store these items. Would it be better to split these items into 100s of thousands of hashes? Should I maybe not use hashes at all? Is there any way to keep them off the heap completely so they never are examined by GC (and if so how would I do so)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T08:51:11+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 8:51 am

    There is no public API to control garbage collection from JavaScript.

    But GC has gone a long way over the years. Modern GC implementations will notice that some objects live long and put them into a special “area” which will be collected only rarely.

    How this exactly works is completely implementation dependent; every browser does it’s own thing and usually, this also often changes when a new browser version is released.

    EDIT The layout on memory and the organization is completely irrelevant. Modern GCs are really hard to understand in detail without investing a couple of weeks reading the actual code. So what I explain now is a really simplified picture; the real code will work different (and some GCs will use completely different tricks to achieve the same goal).

    Imagine that the GC has a counter for each object in which it counts how often it has seen it in the past. Plus it has several lists where it keeps objects of different age, that is with objects whose counters have passed certain thresholds. So when the counter reaches some limit, the object is moved to the next list.

    The first list is visited every time GC runs. The second list is only considered for every Nth GC run.

    An alternate implementation might add new objects to the top of the “GC list” and for every GC run, it will only check N elements. So long living objects will move down the list and after a while, they don’t be checked every time.

    What this means for you is that you don’t have to do anything; the GC will figure out that your huge map lives a long time (and the same is true for all objects in the map) and after a while, it will start to ignore this data structure.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a large collection of objects and I need to figure out the
Very often I have to use objects from the java.util.collection package, objects that conform
I have a C# method that returns very large number of objects. This is
I need help with regular expression. I have very large collection of text files
I have a large collection of custom objects that I have retrieved from a
I have a class that parses very large file (that can't fit in memory)
I have a very large data file with around 60000 rows. I need to
I have a very large possible data set that I am trying to visualize
I have a very large set of permissions in my application that I represent
I have a very large list Suppose I do that (yeah, I know the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.