Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 59267
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:58:42+00:00 2026-05-10T17:58:42+00:00

I have a very large file that looks like this (see below). I have

  • 0

I have a very large file that looks like this (see below). I have two basic choices of regex to use on it (I know there may be others but I’m really trying to compare Greedy and Negated Char Class) methods.

ftp: [^\D]{1,} ftp: (\d)+ ftp: \d+ 

Note: what if I took off the parense around the \d?

Now + is greedy which forces backtracking but the Negated Char Class require a char-by-char comparison. Which is more efficient? Assume the file is very-very large so minute differences in processor usage will become exaggerated due to the length of the file.

Now that you’ve answered that, What if my Negated Char Class was very large, say 18 different characters? Would that change your answer?

Thanks.

ftp: 1117 bytes
ftp: 5696 bytes
ftp: 3207 bytes
ftp: 5696 bytes
ftp: 7200 bytes

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:58:43+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:58 pm

    Both your expressions have the same greediness. As others have said here, except for the capturing group they will execute in the same way.

    Also in this case greediness won’t matter much at the execution speed since you don’t have anything following \d*. In this case the expression will simply process all the digits it can find and stop when the space is encountered. No backtracking should occur with these expressions.

    To make it more explicit, backtracking should occur if you have an expression like this:

    \d*123 

    In this case the parser will engulf all the digits, then backtrack to match the three following digits.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 62k
  • Answers 62k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer If the reader you are using is an XMLReader then… May 11, 2026 at 10:10 am
  • added an answer First, in this text block: if(xmlHttp.responseText == 'result=true') { //… May 11, 2026 at 10:10 am
  • added an answer Actually I think you'll find that IE works because it… May 11, 2026 at 10:10 am

Related Questions

I have a very large file that looks like this (see below). I have
I have a class that parses very large file (that can't fit in memory)
I have a very large code base that contains extensive unit tests (using CppUnit).
I have a very large (~6GB) SVN repository, for which I've written a batch
I have a very large codebase (read: thousands of modules) that has code shared
I have a very large C project with many separate C files and headers
I have a very large app, 1.5 million lines of C++, which is currently
Alright. So I have a very large amount of binary data (let's say, 10GB)
So I have a large number of very large ASCII files of numerical data
I have recently started working on a very large C++ project that, after completing

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.