Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 283941
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:24:58+00:00 2026-05-12T05:24:58+00:00

I have a very simple question. I’d like to use a where clause after

  • 0

I have a very simple question. I’d like to use a where clause after a bloc of code that uses bind operators but I get a compilation error.

Here is a simple example:

main =
    putStrLn "where clause test:" >>
    return [1..10] >>= \list ->
    print list'
        where list' = reverse list -- test1.hs:5:28: Not in scope: `list'

I can use a let clause for list’ as in

main =
    putStrLn "where clause test:" >>
    return [1..10] >>= \list ->
    let list' = reverse list -- works of course
    in print list'

but I’d really like it if I could use a where clause…

I also tried with do notation

main = do
    putStrLn "where clause test:"
    list <- return [1..10]
    print list'
        where list' = reverse list --test3.hs:5:30: Not in scope: `list'

Same problem. Can I use a where clause in these circumstances?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:24:58+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:24 am

    As ephemient explains, you can’t use where clauses the way you do.

    The error happens because in this code:

    main =
      return [1..10] >>= \list ->
      print list'
        where
          list' = reverse list
    

    The where-clause is attached to the main function.

    Here’s that same function with more parentheses:

    main = return [1..10] >>= (\list -> print list')
      where
        list' = reverse list
    

    I think its fairly obvious why you get the “out of scope” error: The binding for list is deep inside the main expression, not something the where clause can reach.

    What I usually do in this situation (and I’ve been bitten by the same thing a bunch of times). I simply introduce a function and pass the list as an argument.

    main = do
      list <- return [1..10]
      let list' = f list
      print list'
      where
        f list = reverse list -- Consider renaming list,
                              -- or writing in point-free style
    

    Of course, I imagine your actual code in the f function is a lot more that just reverse and that’s why you want it inside a where clause, instead of an inline let binding. If the code inside the f function is very small, I’d just write it inside the let binding, and wouldn’t go through the overhead of introducing a new function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a very simple question. I have an SQL query that looks like
I am learning LINQ and have a very simple question that I think will
Here's a very simple question. I have an SP that inserts a row into
I have a very simple Java RMI Server that looks like the following: import
I have a very simple question. I want to test whether a particular port
i have very simple problem. I need to create model, that represent element of
I have very simple select like this: SELECT * FROM table WHERE column1 IN
I have a very simple bit of script that changes the status of an
I have a very simple question, but can't seem to find a strait answer
I have a very simple question to ask! I wish to make a website

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.